BMW 4 series 2017 vs Renault Megane 2016

 
BMW 4 series
2017 -
Renault Megane
2016 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP90 HP
Torque: 320 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds13.7 seconds
BMW 4 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 4 series engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.13.7
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 4 series consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 4 series could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres49 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1460 km in combined cycle1320 km in combined cycle
1660 km on highway1440 km on highway
BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 12 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērijaInstalled on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The BMW 4 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ...  More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine 

Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ...  More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
BMW 4 series is larger, but lower.
BMW 4 series and Renault Megane are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres550 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage space.
BMW 4 series has 70 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0901`852
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 34 60010 800
Pros and Cons: BMW 4 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv