BMW 4 series 2017 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| BMW 4 series engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 6. Despite less power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 4 series consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller. BMW 4 series is 26 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 4 series is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 481 litres | |
| BMW 4 series has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means BMW 4 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 42 800 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |