BMW 4 series 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. BMW 4 series engine produces 269 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 347 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 4 series consumes 6.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1035 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.34 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 4 series is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 4 series is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |