BMW 4 series 2017 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW 4 series) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Mustang) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 475 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. BMW 4 series engine produces 120 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 4 series consumes 5.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 810 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 4 series is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 4 series is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 382 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 31 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |