BMW 4 series 2017 vs Audi TT 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW 4 series) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi TT) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW 4 series engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 80 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 4 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 4 series consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| BMW 4 series is 45 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 4 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 305 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 4 series has 140 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`080 kg | 1`705 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`345 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 360 kg | |
| BMW 4 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Audi TT. Therefore, BMW 4 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 33 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |