BMW 4 series 2017 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
BMW 4 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 4 series engine produces 20 HP more power than Mercedes C class, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
By specification BMW 4 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 4 series could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
1460 km on highway | 1590 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine Mercedes C klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
BMW 4 series is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 4 series is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 480 litres | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. BMW 4 series has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.22 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.58 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 4 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`115 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 23 200 | 27 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |