BMW 4 series 2013 vs Audi TT 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 4 series engine produces 15 HP more power than Audi TT, but torque is 20 NM less than Audi TT. Thanks to more power BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW 4 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW 4 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
| BMW 4 series is 46 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 4 series is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 712 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 4 series has 140 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.96 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.34 metres more than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
| |