BMW 4 series 2013 vs Audi TT 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6 seconds | |
BMW 4 series engine produces 15 HP more power than Audi TT, but torque is 20 NM less than Audi TT. Thanks to more power BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 4 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 4 series could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 4 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
BMW 4 series is 46 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 305 litres | |
BMW 4 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 4 series has 140 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.96 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.34 metres more than that of the Audi TT. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`630 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 19 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |