BMW 4 series 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. BMW 4 series engine produces 144 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.36 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 4 series is 20 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 364 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW 4 series has 81 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |