BMW 4 series 2013 vs Audi TT 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| BMW 4 series and Audi TT have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. BMW 4 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 4 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 4 series could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 4 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
| BMW 4 series is 46 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 4 series is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 712 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 4 series has 140 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |