BMW 4 series 2013 vs Mercedes C class 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 4 series
2013 - 2017
Mercedes C class
2013 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.01.6 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 143 - 326 HP156 - 510 HP
Torque: 270 - 630 NM250 - 700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.8 - 9.2 seconds4 - 8.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 8.34.0 - 8.2
BMW 4 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, BMW 4 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.69 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
BMW 4 series is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 4 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1300 litresno data
BMW 4 series has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes C class.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.22 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.58 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 4 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`136~ 2`089
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 18 40025 400
Pros and Cons: BMW 4 sērija has
  • lower price
Mercedes C klase has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv