BMW 4 series 2013 vs Kia Cerato 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 4 series
2013 - 2017
Kia Cerato
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 4 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)1.6 - 2.0 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 143 - 326 HP130 - 150 HP
Torque: 270 - 630 NM157 - 194 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.8 - 9.2 seconds9.3 - 11.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 8.36.5 - 7.2
BMW 4 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.56 m
Width: 1.83 m1.78 m
Height: 1.39 m1.45 m
BMW 4 series is larger, but lower.
BMW 4 series is 8 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 4 series is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres482 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1300 litresno data
BMW 4 series has 1 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means BMW 4 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`136~ 1`740
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 20 800no data
Pros and Cons: BMW 4 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Kia Cerato has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv