BMW 4 series 2017 vs Skoda Octavia 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 4 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 4 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 326 HP | 110 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 630 NM | 250 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 9 seconds | 6.9 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 7.1 | 3.7 - 5.0 | |
|
BMW 4 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, BMW 4 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.47 m | |
|
BMW 4 series is smaller. BMW 4 series is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 4 series is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. BMW 4 series has 160 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 1.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means BMW 4 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`145 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Octavia is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 800 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |