BMW 4 series 2017 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 326 HP | 136 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 630 NM | 330 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 9 seconds | 3.9 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 7.1 | 4.2 - 11.4 | |
|
BMW 4 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo Giulia. On average, BMW 4 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| BMW 4 series and Alfa Romeo Giulia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 1 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Giulia, which means BMW 4 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`145 kg | ~ 2`094 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 4 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 4 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 800 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
| |