BMW 4 series 2020 vs Audi S5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 4 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi S5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 4 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 382 HP | 347 - 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 700 NM | 500 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.5 seconds | 4.7 - 4.9 seconds | |
| In general, Audi S5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW 4 series. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.7 | 6.2 - 7.5 | |
|
BMW 4 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi S5. On average, BMW 4 series equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi S5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 4 series is 2 cm longer than the Audi S5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1245 litres | |
|
Audi S5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW 4 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 4 series is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi S5. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`173 kg | ~ 2`305 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`689 kg | ~ 1`728 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 484 kg | ~ 577 kg | |
| BMW 4 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Audi S5. Therefore, Audi S5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 200 | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 4 sērija has
|
Audi S5 has
| |