BMW 3 series 2010 vs BMW 5 series 2011
Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 75 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
740 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.46 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 29 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 520 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 310 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.9 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`055 | 2`230 | |
Safety: | |||
The BMW 5 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | low | |
BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |