BMW 3 series 2007 vs Audi TT 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW 3 series) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Audi TT) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 19 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 180 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 40 cm longer than the Audi TT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
350 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`755 kg | 1`470 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 320 kg | |
| BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Audi TT. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |