BMW 3 series 2007 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.7 | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes CLK 2005 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
BMW 3 series is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 276 litres | |
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 66 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`055 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 9600 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |