BMW 3 series 2007 vs Audi A5 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 211 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 55 HP less power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.8 | |
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi Q5 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine: The BMW N43 engine is built around a lightweight alloy cylinder block with a twin-cam, 16-valve head. It uses a dual-pump fuel delivery system—one located inside the tank to transfer fuel and supply the high-pressure pump, which then boosts fuel pressure up to 200 bar. Notably, the system lacks a fine fuel filter and relies only on a ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine Audi A5 2009 2.0 engine: This engine offers a good balance of power and fuel efficiency but is highly demanding in terms of service quality. One of its most notable issues is excessive oil consumption. While the manufacturer addressed this ... More about Audi A5 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 750 litres | |
Audi A5 has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 110 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 9600 | 9600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A5 has
| |