BMW 3 series 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 2000

 
BMW 3 series
2000 - 2003
Mercedes CLK
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 192 HP163 HP
Torque: 245 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds9.9 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 29 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.69.5
BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway860 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.57 m
Width: 1.76 m1.72 m
Height: 1.37 m1.38 m
BMW 3 series is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
300 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9602`020
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 50004200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Mercedes CLK has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv