BMW 3 series 2000 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 1 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 12.4 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 3 series is 42 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 12 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |