BMW 3 series 2010 vs Audi A5 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 272 HP | 265 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP more power than Audi A5, but torque is 10 NM less than Audi A5. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
580 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2010 3.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine. Most of the problems are related to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high-pressure fuel pump were common in ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 3 series and Audi A5 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
BMW 3 series has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 400 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi A5 has
| |