BMW 3 series 2010 vs Audi A5 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 265 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
Audi A5 is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 47 HP less power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Audi A5. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2010 3.0 engine: Engine is relatively reliable. Most problems relate to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high pressure fuel pump were common in early model ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 3 series and Audi A5 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
BMW 3 series has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 400 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi A5 has
| |