BMW 3 series 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 323 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 167 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine: The BMW N43 engine is built around a lightweight alloy cylinder block with a twin-cam, 16-valve head. It uses a dual-pump fuel delivery system—one located inside the tank to transfer fuel and supply the high-pressure pump, which then boosts fuel pressure up to 200 bar. Notably, the system lacks a fine fuel filter and relies only on a ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 3 series is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 364 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 76 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |