BMW 3 series 2010 vs Renault Laguna 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 27 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 423 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`972 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |