BMW 3 series 2007 vs BMW X3 2004
Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 27 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1400 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 18 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.67 m | |
BMW 3 series is 2 cm longer than the BMW X3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 27 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 3 series has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`255 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 7400 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW X3 has
| |