BMW 3 series 2003 vs Mercedes C class 2011
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 75 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW Z4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes CLS, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.45 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 10 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 475 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |