BMW 3 series 2003 vs Mercedes E class 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 14 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 510 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z4, BMW Z3 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 3 sērija 2003 2.2 engine: The BMW M54B22 is a 2.2-liter naturally aspirated inline-six producing around 170 hp. It is generally regarded as a durable and well-balanced engine, typical of BMW’s classic straight-six lineup. When maintained properly it can easily exceed 300,000 km, but it does have several known weaknesses that owners should ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2003 2.2 engine Mercedes E klase 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes E klase 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.51 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 42 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 285 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 545 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |