BMW 3 series 2003 vs Hyundai Coupe 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP more power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 144 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
1400 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
980 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Hyundai Coupe) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.33 m | |
BMW 3 series is 9 cm longer than the Hyundai Coupe, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 312 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 98 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`740 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |