BMW 3 series 2003 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 304 HP | |
Torque: | 330 NM | 427 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
BMW 3 series engine produces 154 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 13.0 | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 7.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1095 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 61 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
1400 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 28 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 12 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 350 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 60 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |