BMW 3 series 1999 vs Toyota Avensis 2003
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 30 HP more power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Toyota Avensis. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Avensis) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW Z3 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.48 m | |
BMW 3 series is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota Avensis, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Avensis, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`895 | 1`400 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 440 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |