BMW 3 series 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.0 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 3 series is 43 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 12 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 923 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 513 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`895 | 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |