BMW 3 series 1999 vs BMW X3 2004

 
BMW 3 series
1999 - 2000
BMW X3
2004 - 2006
Body: CoupeCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 193 HP231 HP
Torque: 280 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 seconds7.8 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 38 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW X3. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.111.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km11.3 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway770 km on highway
640 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW Z3Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW Z4
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.
BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW M54B30 is a 3.0-liter naturally aspirated inline-six producing about 231 hp, produced between 2000 and 2006. It is widely regarded as one of BMW’s more successful engines of that era, known for smooth operation and strong performance. With proper maintenance, these engines often ...  More about BMW X3 2004 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.56 m
Width: 1.76 m1.85 m
Height: 1.37 m1.67 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 30 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1560 litres
BMW X3 has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 70 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3.
Turning diameter: 10 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 2 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8952`260
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
BMW X3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 38004400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
BMW X3 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv