BMW 3 series 1999 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 2002

 
BMW 3 series
1999 - 2000
Alfa Romeo GTV
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 193 HP150 HP
Torque: 280 NM181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 seconds8.5 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 43 HP more power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Alfa Romeo GTV. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.19.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Alfa Romeo GTV is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway1020 km on highway
640 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo GTV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW Z3Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo Spider
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo GTV might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.28 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.37 m1.32 m
BMW 3 series is 21 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres110 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 300 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8951`780
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 26003400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo GTV has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv