BMW 3 series 1999 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
BMW 3 series
1999 - 2000
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP180 HP
Torque: 190 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 3 series engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.010.0
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway920 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
BMW 3 series has 14 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9002`030
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 28001600
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv