BMW 3 series 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 18 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW Z3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 420 litres | |
| BMW 3 series has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |