BMW 3 series 1999 vs BMW X3 2005
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 32 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW X3. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW Z3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW Z4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.67 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 70 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 2 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW X3 has
| |