BMW 3 series 1995 vs Audi TT 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 57 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.34 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 39 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 220 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 215 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`875 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 390 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |
