BMW 3 series 1992 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mitsubishi Eclipse. Despite the higher power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.7 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Eclipse) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Eclipse engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 241 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 194 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |