BMW 3 series 1992 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 214 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, but torque is 24 NM less than Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.9 | |
| BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Eclipse) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Eclipse engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 39 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Space Wagon, Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Eclipse might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.31 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 3 series is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`918 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |