BMW 3 series 1992 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 43 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 12.0 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.35 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 3 series is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 15 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`760 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |