BMW 3 series 1992 vs Audi Coupe 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 165 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 34 HP more power than Audi Coupe, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Audi Coupe. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Audi Coupe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
690 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Audi Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi Coupe) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 6 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 296 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 139 litres more trunk space than the Audi Coupe. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Coupe, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi Coupe has
| |