BMW 3 series 1996 vs BMW 3 series 1999

 
BMW 3 series
1996 - 1999
BMW 3 series
1999 - 2001
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP105 HP
Torque: 180 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds14 seconds
BMW 3 series 1996 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series 1996 engine produces 35 HP more power than BMW 3 series 1999, whereas torque is 15 NM more than BMW 3 series 1999. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The BMW 3 series 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series 1999, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series 1996 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series 1999.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway940 km on highway
590 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
BMW 3 series 1996 is smaller.
BMW 3 series 1996 is 26 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series 1999, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series 1996 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litresno data
BMW 3 series 1999 has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series 1996 has 115 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series 1999.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7001`820
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 20002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv