BMW 3 series 1993 vs Renault Megane 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Renault Megane. Despite the higher power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Modus | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 348 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1210 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 3 series has 23 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 180 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`595 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Renault Megane has
| |