BMW 3 series 1993 vs Toyota Carina E 1992

 
BMW 3 series
1993 - 1999
Toyota Carina E
1992 - 1996
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 102 HP116 HP
Torque: 150 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.3 seconds
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 3 series engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, but torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
650 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Carina E) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 9 years15 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Celica
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.53 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
BMW 3 series is 32 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1250 litres
Toyota Carina E has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 145 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Carina E (by 220 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6351`600
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

high
Toyota Carina E has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20001200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
Toyota Carina E has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv