BMW 3 series 1993 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 42 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Peugeot 106. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 106) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is larger. BMW 3 series is 53 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 11 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 953 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 110 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 77 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |