BMW 3 series 1999 vs BMW 3 series 1996

 
BMW 3 series
1999 - 2000
BMW 3 series
1996 - 1998
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP140 HP
Torque: 165 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds11 seconds
BMW 3 series 1996 is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 3 series 1999 engine produces 35 HP less power than BMW 3 series 1996, whereas torque is 15 NM less than BMW 3 series 1996. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.3 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The BMW 3 series 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series 1999 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series 1999 could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series 1999 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series 1996.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway1000 km on highway
550 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series 1996 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.43 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.39 m
BMW 3 series 1999 is 22 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series 1996, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litresno data
BMW 3 series 1996 has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series 1999 has 110 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series 1996.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`760
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 20002400
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv