BMW 3 series 2001 vs Volvo S40 2002

 
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 143 HP136 HP
Torque: 200 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds11 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volvo S40. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.9
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway900 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S40) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S40 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years4 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Volvo V40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S40 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.48 m
Width: 1.75 m1.72 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
BMW 3 series is 22 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 310 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1100 litres853 litres
BMW 3 series has 161 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 247 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8201`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 22001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S40 has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv