BMW 3 series 2001 vs Suzuki Liana 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 13 HP more power than Suzuki Liana, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Suzuki Liana. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Suzuki Liana) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.55 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is larger, but lower. BMW 3 series is 3 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1062 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW 3 series has 38 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 38 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |