BMW 3 series 2015 vs Volvo S60 2013

 
BMW 3 series
2015 - 2018
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP163 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds9.2 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 57 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1290 km in combined cycle1390 km in combined cycle
1460 km on highway1630 km on highway
910 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.87 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
BMW 3 series and Volvo S60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1749 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 100 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`110
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 22 40011 000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volvo S60 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv